LITERACY ACTION PLAN
Target: Increase in writing NECAP test scores to 69%. Increase in reading NECAP test scores to 79%
Result
Statement: All students will be
able to thoughtfully
and critically (p.34
literacy) respond
to information resources utilizing reading,
writing, speaking, listening and viewing skills.
|
Changes in student learning behavior:
What will students do to reach the identified
results? What new things will they do to learn? What things will they do
more of? |
Changing Instruction:
What will teachers do to ensure students learn and develop the learning
behaviors identified in the first column?
(Be sure that the instructional practices you identify will address
every student learning behavior.) |
Collaboration and Support:
When will we use the information we get from monitoring to improve
learning and teaching? When will we discuss the progress we are making?
|
Monitoring Progress with Timelines and
Adjustments: How will we measure progress towards the
changes in learning behavior and teaching that we want? How often will
this occur? How will we keep the principal, parents, and SIT informed
and involved? |
School and District Support and Resources:
What support and resources will the school and
district provide in order to achieve the results of this action plan?
(List the support and resources below and then use the attached template
to finalize this column.) |
Evaluating Results/Reporting to Families and Community:
How will the school know if their students reach
the intended results? In light of what we have learned, how will we
revise the plan for next year?
Reporting to families and the Community:
How will we share results of this plan with the
entire school community? |
|
Students will:
·
Know, understand, and demonstrate academic expectation in all classrooms
·
Analyze and interpret
information from differentiated
print and non-print resources
·
Engage in purposeful
accountable talk: accountability to knowledge, accountability to
rigorous thinking, accountability to learning community.
·
Generate questions that demonstrate
their ability to think and respond critically as accountable members of
the learning community
|
Teachers will:
·
Implement effective daily lesson
structure/workshop model
·
Provide
clear and consistent academic expectations
·
Provide
clear and consistent rubrics for student work across disciplines
and grade levels
·
Model rituals, routines, and
procedures (classroom norms) that support the academic expectations
·
Guide students in understanding and
applying academic expectations and classroom norms
·
Provide meaningful and open ended
discussions
·
Model appropriate discussion
strategies and techniques
·
Facilitate accountable talk in
student dominated class discussion
·
Use questions to frame lessons and
tasks to promote critical thinking
·
Model thinking process when posing
questions at the inferential and applied levels.
·
Provide various and differentiated
print and non-print resources
·
·
Use appropriate pre-reading/critical
thinking strategies – frontload
·
difficult concepts
·
Establish a purpose for
reading/instruction
·
Teach and provide models of
strategies for analyzing and interpreting information
·
Provide instructional
supports/formative assessments (graphic organizers, prompted outlines,
guided discussions, etc.) to promote understanding and enhance student
performance.
·
Use formative assessment to adjust
instruction and hold students accountable for learning
·
Provide
opportunities for students to share exemplary work and explain
why it is exemplary |
When we will collaborate:
·
CPT
·
Faculty and Department meetings
·
SIT meetings
·
Critical Friends group
·
Professional Release Time
·
Curriculum Coordinators meetings |
Teachers will:
·
Assess their own level of
proficiency in literacy instruction through feedback from the Literacy
Walk Reports
·
Use feedback from professional
development to reflect on their own practice
·
Collaboratively look at student work
·
Calibrate the scoring of student
work across content areas
·
Teacher leaders will:
·
Utilize the Literacy Walk evaluation
tool to assess the degree to
which literacy practices are used during instruction
·
Collect and analyze the
data to assess current teaching/learning practices/skills
·
Train teams of colleagues in
analysis of student work
·
Facilitate the calibration and
consistent scoring of student work
Administrators will:
·
Develop a calendar for monitoring
progress of
the
plan
·
Lead and facilitate Learning Walks
·
Communicate results of assessments
to faculty and community
·
Oversee the implementation and
monitoring of the plan
|
The school will supply the following support and resources:
·
Continue to schedule CPT
·
Print and non-print resources that
are appropriate and engaging for diverse learners
·
Provide job embedded professional
development on best practices in critical literacy (Workshop Model
incorporating effective lesson structure and Gradual Release of
Responsibility, Accountable Talk), differentiated instruction, and
collaborative group work.
The central office will supply the following support and resources:
·
Funding for professional development
and resources
·
Funding for Media Center to provide
differentiated literacy resources for teachers and students |
Evaluating results:
·
Improved test scores (individually
and collectively) on state, local, and school assessments
·
Increase frequency of positive
teacher and student comments/attitudes related to the teaching of
literacy as measured by SALT, literacy evaluation tool, and
Literacy Walk Reports
·
Increase in circulation of
Reporting to the community:
·
School Report Night
·
School Committee
·
Presentations
·
School Website
·
Open House
·
Parent Listserv
·
Parent Teacher Conferences
·
Local Newspapers
·
PTSA Meetings
|